Can The United States Justify The Civil War :: essays research papers

Can the United States Justify the Civil War     The exposition of Manifest Destiny reads as "The belief in the 1840sin the indispensable territorial expansion of the United States, especially asadvocated by gray slaveholders who wished to extend slavery into newterritories." This explanation was transcribed from the World loudnessEncyclopedias dictionary. It is directly evident that from this unbiasedstatement we can trace the graduation exercise uprising of a separate group of people yearningto prisonbreak the newly formed bond of the great United States.     Before and during the Mexican War, the people who were pushing for theclaimed land once owned by unbiased native americans, were al moods looking for ascapegoat. They needed one way or another, a way to squirm out of taking the diabolic for the enslaved and murdered Mexican causalities. There was one man,though, who would not let this happen, David Wilmot. David Wilmot was ademocrat from Pennsylvania, who was willing to revise the Presidents bill. Inthis revision, Wilmot proposed "...neither slavery nor involuntary servitudeshall always exist in all part of the territory...". This was not well desire bythe South and eventhough it was given thumbs up many times in the senate, ournewly formed country was now bordered by neat land. The Wilmot Provisounderwent quite a bit of pressure so that compromises could satiate each side.     The Compromise of 1850 was soon to follow but the real snap fastener of the sameyear was the Fugitive Slave Act. This act was invented so that the slaves ofslaveowners, who took them to a slave-free state on a vacation or something,could not escape. In this act, the hardest part to understand, was that thecourts were to try to give a fair trial to any runaway slaves. This enfuriatedmany of the Northern abolitionists who now were going to expand the tracks ofthe vacuum tube railroad to help ext end their efforts in the rescue of therunaways. The point of no return, where many people knew for sure that thecountry would be devided between the northwestern and the south was the ruling on theKansas Nebraska Act. This act was majorly contributed into by Stephen A.Douglas and credibly would never have passed without his consent. The wholeidea behind the act that in reality got to the south was Popular Sovereignty. Thisso called " item" rule was none to specific in stating when a territory coulddecide when they were pro or anti slavverry. The abolitionists were floodingthe new territory with their own kind where as the southerners were alone moving